man-user-icon Client Login Portal
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    Labaton Sucharow
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Contact Us
    • Knowledge Network
    • Client Login
    • Search
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    Labaton Sucharow
    • Ongoing Cases
    • Settled | Resolved Cases
    • Featured Cases
      • Securities
      • Derivative
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • REITs and Limited Partnerships
      • Consumer Products & Data Privacy

    In re Vaalco Energy Inc. Consolidated Stockholder Litigation

    Settled: December 21, 2015

    A Landmark Victory Secured in the Fight for Stockholders’ Fundamental Voting Rights

    VAALCO Energy challenged their shareholders’ fundamental right to replace board members with an unlawful charter and bylaw provision. In less than two weeks, in the midst of the holiday season, Labaton Sucharow, as co-lead counsel, established important regarding shareholders’ ability to remove and replace board members. The significance of this ruling also lies in its response to a frequently asked, but before now unanswered, question on shareholders’ right to remove directors.

    In December 2015, a group of activist investors sought to replace half of VAALCO’s board of directors. In response, VAALCO asserted that the stockholders lacked the ability to remove the members of the board except for cause, as stated in the company’s charter and bylaws. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), a majority of stockholders may remove directors of a Delaware corporation with or without cause, unless the company has a staggered board or classified voting. VAALCO had neither a staggered board nor classified voting. Shareholders alleged that VAALCO’s charter and bylaws violated the DGCL.

    In less than two weeks, we secured full relief on our claims after the Delaware Court of Chancery’s bench ruling, granting our motion for summary judgment and invalidating VAALCO’s charter and bylaw provisions. In addition to vindicating VAALCO stockholders’ fundamental removal rights, the action also led to an immediate settlement between the activist investors, which settlement provided for, among other things, the replacement of several of VAALCO’s incumbent directors.

    After this favorable ruling, white shoe defense firms immediately began advising their clients to amend their charters and bylaws to the extent they contained similar shareholder-unfriendly provisions. As reported by Bloomberg in February 2016, our victory “spur[red] a rush by Delaware corporations to amend their director-removal provisions,” with tens of companies amending their charters and bylaws within less than two months of the Court of Chancery’s ruling.

    The case is In re Vaalco Energy Inc. Consolidated Stockholder Litigation, No. 11776, in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

    Useful Links

    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Center

    Our Locations

    footer-list-map_icon New York
    140 Broadway
    New York, NY 10005
    212-907-0700

    footer-list-map_icon Delaware
    222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510
    Wilmington, DE 19801
    302-573-2540

    Useful Links

    footer-list-map_icon Washington, D.C.
    1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    212-907-0700

    Stay Connected

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    Labaton Sucharow
    • Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Transparency in Coverage Rule
    • labaton.com
    • Labaton Sucharow All Rights Reserved 2022

    Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

    The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon any single source of information, including advertising on this website. You may ask us to send you further information about us, and we urge you to review other sources of information about us.