Settled: November 26, 2018
On December 6, 2012, Labaton Sucharow was appointed as co-lead counsel for lead plaintiffs in a securities class action against Facebook, Inc. relating to the company's May 17, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”).
On May 17, 2012, Facebook and the IPO underwriters conducted the IPO—in which the selling shareholders sold 421 million shares of Facebook stock at $38 per share for total proceeds of over $16 billion, representing one of the largest IPOs for a technology company in history. The very next day, previously undisclosed news of Facebook's declining revenues began to emerge. Reuters reported that, just days before the IPO, Facebook had taken the "rare and disruptive" step of cutting its revenue guidance to analysts during the time period that its IPO roadshow was occurring. This news swept through the market and, over the weekend of May 19-20, 2012, members of the financial press reported that this information was highly material and fundamentally affected the value of the company's stock.
Reuters later revealed additional information regarding Facebook's revenue cuts, including that, in response, analysts from three of the lead IPO underwriters (Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase) had also revised their revenue estimates for the company in the midst of the company's IPO roadshow, but disclosed this fact only to a small number of select clients. In response to the above disclosures, the Facebook's stock price fell more than 18 percent below the IPO price, wiping out billions of dollars in market capitalization. The lead plaintiffs, who represent a class of purchasers of Facebook Class A common stock in the IPO, allege that Facebook made materially untrue and misleading statements in its Registration Statement and Prospectus.
The lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on February 28, 2013. On April 30, 2013, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. On December 12, 2013, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in all respects, an important victory for lead plaintiffs and the class. In a second attempt, the defendants filed a motion to amend and certify the December 12 ruling for interlocutory appeal. On March 13, 2014, the court denied that motion as well, stating, "the issues raised by Defendants' are a repeat of the arguments Defendants unsuccessfully raised in its motion to dismiss, and a motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal may not be used to simply 'repeat arguments made in [a] motion to dismiss.'"
Lead plaintiffs moved for class certification on December 23, 2014, and on December 11, 2015, the court granted class certification. Labaton Sucharow with co-lead counsel jointly stated, "For our country's initial public offering process to work efficiently, there must be accountability when the process is misused. The certification was an important step for the case and for financial accountability more generally." Class Notice was mailed to potential class members beginning on August 4, 2016. The deadline for seeking exclusion from the class was October 3, 2016.
Merits and expert discovery was completed and motions for summary judgment and Daubert motions were pending before the court when the Parties reached their agreement in principle to settle the action.
The case is In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation, No. 12-md-02389 (S.D.N.Y.). The lead plaintiffs are Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and Fresno County Employees' Retirement Association. Labaton Sucharow represents North Carolina Department of State Treasurer and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System. The defendants include Facebook, Inc., certain Facebook directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Facebook IPO.
Submit Proof of Claim
If you purchased or otherwise acquired Class A common stock of Facebook in or traceable to Facebook’s May 17, 2012 IPO during the period from May 17, 2012 through May 21, 2012, inclusive, and were damaged thereby, you may be entitled to receive money from the proposed settlement. To be eligible for a payment, you must submit a Claim Form by July 24, 2018 in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Settlement Notice. However, if you believe you are a class member and you wish to be eligible for a payment and have not yet submitted a Claim Form (because you received a late notice packet or for any other reason), please submit your Claim Form and supporting documentation as soon as possible. While we cannot guarantee that the Court will accept late claims, if your claim is otherwise eligible, Lead Counsel will ask the Court to accept it.
Settlement Hearing
A Settlement Hearing was held on September 5, 2018 before the Honorable Robert W. Sweet. On November 26, 2018, the Court entered an Opinion & Order granting Lead Plaintiffs' motion for final approval of the Settlement, approval of the proposed Plan of Allocation, and Lead Counsel's motion for attorneys' fees and expenses. The Court also entered a Judgment Approving Class Action Settlement, an Order Approving the Plan of Allocation of Net Settlement Fund, and an Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees and Expenses.
If you have questions about the settlement, please contact Labaton Sucharow at settlementquestions@labaton.com or 1-888-219-6877, or contact the Claims Administrator, AB Data, Ltd. at (866) 963-9974.
Judgment Approving Class Action Settlement
Order Approving Plan of Allocation of Net Settlement Fund
Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees and Expenses
Notice of Lead Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Payment of Litigation Expenses
Notice of Pendency of Class Action
Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss
Opinion and Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal
Useful Links
Our Locations
New York
140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
212-907-0700
Delaware
300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1340
Wilmington, DE 19801
302-573-2540
Useful Links
Washington, D.C.
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-772-1880
The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon any single source of information, including advertising on this website. You may ask us to send you further information about us, and we urge you to review other sources of information about us.