Skip to Main Content
Lantern_Icon_blue
Lantern by Labaton
Link_Arrow
ClientConnect_Icon_blue
Client Connect
Link_Arrow
Labaton Logo
  • The Firm
  • Practices
  • Our Team
  • Cases
  • News & Insights
  • Client Services
  • Careers
Contact Us
Established 1963

Back to Resolved Cases
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Updated: August 20, 2020

Plymouth County Retirement Association v. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Case Materials

Specrum Brands Complaint
Notice and Claim Form
Stipulation and Agreement
Preliminary Approval Order
Notice of Motion and Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement
Memo of Law ISO Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement
Lead Counsel’s Notice of Motion and Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Payment of Expenses
Memo of Law ISO of Lead Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Payment of Expenses
Declaration of Jonathan Gardner and Exhibits 1-8
Final Order and Judgement
Order Approving Plan of Allocation
Order Approving Fees and Expenses

If you purchased or otherwise acquired common stock of Spectrum, as successor-in-interest to HRG, pursuant or traceable to the Registration Statement for the July 13, 2018, merger of Old Spectrum and HRG, you may be entitled to a payment from a class action settlement.

On August 16, 2019, plaintiff Plymouth County Retirement Association filed an amended securities class action complaint against Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (Spectrum or the Company) relating to the merger between Spectrum Brands Legacy, Inc. (Old Spectrum) and HRG Group, Inc. (HRG).  Spectrum, formerly known as HRG, is a global branded consumer products company that manufactures, markets, and distributes a wide array of products, including for example: plumbing and hardware, pet supplies, household products and repellents, and auto care goods.  The amended complaint asserted claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement for the July 13, 2018, merger of Old Spectrum and HRG contained false statements and omissions of material fact.  These alleged misstatements primarily concerned undisclosed materially adverse contentions, trends, and uncertainties involving Old Spectrum’s inventory, supply chain, segment goodwill, and operational efficiencies, and are alleged to have caused the Settlement Class to suffer losses after the merger.  On August 20, 2020, the Court approved the Settlement, Plan of Allocation, and request for attorneys’ fees and expenses.

The case is Plymouth County Retirement Association v. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 19-cv-982.  Labaton Keller Sucharow represents plaintiff Plymouth County Retirement Association. The defendants are Spectrum, HRG, and certain of their officers and directors.

Submit Claim Form

If you purchased or otherwise acquired common stock of Spectrum, as successor-in-interest to HRG, pursuant or traceable to the Registration Statement for the July 13, 2018, merger of Old Spectrum and HRG, you may be entitled to a payment from a class action settlement.  To be eligible for a payment, you must submit a Claim Form to the Claims Administrator by October 2, 2020.

logo

Our Locations

New York

140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
Tel: +1 212.907.0700

Delaware

222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: +1 302.573.2540

London

1 King William Street
London, EC4N 7AF United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 3582 0981

Washington, D.C.

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20036
Tel: +1 202.772.1881

Useful Links

  • Practices
  • Cases
  • News & Insights
  • Client Services
  • Contact

The Firm

  • Our Team
  • Our Story
  • Awards & Accolades
  • Offices
  • Social Commitment
  • Careers for Attorneys
  • Careers for Business Professionals
  • Attorney Development

Stay Connected

fbfb
Facebook
Xx
Twitter / X
inin
LinkedIn
Footer_Graphic
© Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP All Rights Reserved 2026
Attorney Advertising DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyCalifornia Privacy Policy and Notice of Collection of Personal InformationTransparency in Coverage Rule