Skip to Main Content
Lantern_Icon_blue
Lantern by Labaton
Link_Arrow
ClientConnect_Icon_blue
Client Connect
Link_Arrow
Labaton Logo
  • The Firm
  • Practices
  • Our Team
  • Cases
  • News & Insights
  • Client Services
  • Careers
Contact Us
Established 1963

Back to Resolved Cases
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Updated: January 25, 2019

In re AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. Stockholder Litigation

In 2014, Labaton Keller Sucharow filed a derivative complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery relating to certain transactions involving AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (AmTrust) and its controlling shareholders the Karfunkel Family.

In the fall of 2013, AmTrust was negotiating to acquire distressed insurance company Tower Group International, Ltd. However, in December 2013, AmTrust withdrew its proposal and submitted an offer for Tower on behalf a separate, private entity controlled by the Karfunkel Family.  The Karfunkel Family then sold certain of Tower’s valuable assets to yet another entity they controlled, National General Holdings Corp.  They also sold certain less-valuable assets of Tower back to AmTrust.

The initial complaint alleged that the Karfunkel Family—which owes fiduciary duties to AmTrust and its stockholders by virtue of their status as controlling shareholders—wrongfully took a corporate opportunity from AmTrust and otherwise breached their fiduciary duties to the company.  The complaint further alleges that the AmTrust board breached its fiduciary duties by acting to advance the interests of the Karfunkel Family, rather than the interests of AmTrust and its minority stockholders.  As an indication of the strength of our claims, eight of nine defendants answered our complaint, rather than moving to dismiss.  In June 2016, the court denied the only motion to dismiss filed.

Following the announcement that AmTrust would be acquired by Evergreen Parent, L.P., an entity formed by private equity funds managed by Stone Point Capital, together with AmTrust’s Chairman and CEO Barry Zyskind, George Karfunkel and Leah Karfunkel, the Firm filed a new complaint against the same defendants of the derivative suit challenging the fairness of the take private transaction.

On November 16, 2018, Labaton Keller Sucharow was appointed co-lead counsel.  Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint on January 25, 2019, that alleged conflicts amongst members of the AmTrust board of directors’ special committee who reviewed and approved the take private transaction.  Plaintiffs subsequently filed an operative consolidated complaint on May 8, 2019. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint.  The Court held oral argument on November 5, 2019.

On February 26, 2020, the Court issued an opinion denying the core defendants’ motions to dismiss.  Following substantial document discovery, the parties entered a settlement stipulation to resolve the class action for $40 million.  The settlement was approved by the Court on November 22, 2021.

The case is In re AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, No. 2018-0396-LWW in the Delaware Court of Chancery.  Labaton Keller Sucharow represents co-lead plaintiff Cambridge Retirement System.

logo

Our Locations

New York

140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
Tel: +1 212.907.0700

Delaware

222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: +1 302.573.2540

London

1 King William Street
London, EC4N 7AF United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 3582 0981

Washington, D.C.

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20036
Tel: +1 202.772.1881

Useful Links

  • Practices
  • Cases
  • News & Insights
  • Client Services
  • Contact

The Firm

  • Our Team
  • Our Story
  • Awards & Accolades
  • Offices
  • Social Commitment
  • Careers for Attorneys
  • Careers for Business Professionals
  • Attorney Development

Stay Connected

fbfb
Facebook
Xx
Twitter / X
inin
LinkedIn
Footer_Graphic
© Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP All Rights Reserved 2026
Attorney Advertising DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyCalifornia Privacy Policy and Notice of Collection of Personal InformationTransparency in Coverage Rule