Skip to Main Content
Lantern_Icon_blue
Lantern by Labaton
Link_Arrow
ClientConnect_Icon_blue
Client Connect
Link_Arrow
Labaton Logo
  • The Firm
  • Practices
  • Our Team
  • Cases
  • News & Insights
  • Client Services
  • Careers
Contact Us
Established 1963

Back to Resolved Cases
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Updated: June 7, 2022

In re Acuity Brands, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Materials

Amended Complaint
Notice and Claim Form
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement
Preliminary Approval Order
Class Representatives’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Plan of Allocation
Class Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Expenses
Joint Declaration of Andrew L. Zivitz and James W. Johnson ISO Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Plan of Allocation and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, with Exhibits 1-10
Judgment Approving Class Action Settlement
Order Approving Plan of Allocation
Order Awarding Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Expenses
Order Authorizing Distribution of Net Settlement Fund

On August 13, 2018, Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP was appointed co-lead counsel in a securities class action lawsuit against Acuity Brands, Inc., a leading provider of lighting solutions for commercial, institutional industrial, infrastructure, and residential applications throughout North America and select international markets.  The action asserts claims under sections Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rules 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased Acuity common stock between October 7, 2015, and April 3, 2017 (the Class Period).

On October 5, 2018, lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended class action complaint that alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions to the market regarding Acuity’s ability to maintain the remarkable rate of sales growth it had experienced in the years prior to the Class Period.  Since 2010, Acuity had experienced an unbroken run of rapid growth, driven by a recovery in non-residential construction following the financial crisis, and a massive boom in LED lighting technology, which vastly expanded Acuity’s opportunities for both new installations and retrofitting using its products.  However, the complaint alleges that facing an influx of new competitors, Acuity sought to reinvent itself into a lighting technology company.  These efforts were a colossal failure as Acuity’s new products suffered from a host of technical problems and failed to gain widespread adoption.  Additionally, Acuity’s most important customer, The Home Depot – which accounted for more than 10 percent of Acuity’s annual revenues for over a decade – began to shift its business away from Acuity in favor of cheaper suppliers overseas.  In the face of rapidly deteriorating demand and vanishing prospects for growth, the defendants made a series of materially false statements to the market that concealed known trends negatively impacting sales of Acuity’s products and overstated Acuity’s ability to achieve profitable sales growth.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint and on August 12, 2019, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss.  On November 25, 2019, lead plaintiff moved for class certification.  The Court heard oral argument on lead plaintiff’s motion and on August 25, 2020, the Court granted class certification.  By the Court’s order, the Court certified class, appointed Mississippi PERS as class representative and appointed Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP and Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP as Class Counsel.  Defendants filed a motion to appeal the class certification order to the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Rule 23(f).

While discovery was ongoing and the motion for class certification was pending, the Parties agreed to mediation.  Following two mediation sessions and months of discussions, the Parties agreed to resolve the Action and memorialized the terms of their agreement in a term sheet executed on October 5, 2021.  The Parties executed the Stipulation of Settlement on December 2, 2021.

The case is In re Acuity Brands, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 18-cv-02140 (N.D. Ga.).  Labaton Keller Sucharow represents lead plaintiff Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi.  The defendants are Acuity Brands, Inc., Acuity’s CEO Vernon J. Nagel, Acuity’s CFO Richard K. Reece, and Acuity’s former Executive Vice President Mark A. Black.

Settlement Hearing

The Settlement Hearing was held on June 3, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. EDT remotely via Zoom and the court approved the Settlement and Plan of Allocation and awarded attorneys' fees and expenses.

On December 29, 2023, the Court authorized a distribution of the Net Settlement Fund.  We are in the process of distributing the Net Settlement fund to eligible claimants.  If you receive a payment and have any questions or need assistance, please call the Claims Administrator, at 1-888-274-4004.

logo

Our Locations

New York

140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
Tel: +1 212.907.0700

Delaware

222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: +1 302.573.2540

London

1 King William Street
London, EC4N 7AF United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 3582 0981

Washington, D.C.

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20036
Tel: +1 202.772.1881

Useful Links

  • Practices
  • Cases
  • News & Insights
  • Client Services
  • Contact

The Firm

  • Our Team
  • Our Story
  • Awards & Accolades
  • Offices
  • Social Commitment
  • Careers for Attorneys
  • Careers for Business Professionals
  • Attorney Development

Stay Connected

fbfb
Facebook
Xx
Twitter / X
inin
LinkedIn
Footer_Graphic
© Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP All Rights Reserved 2026
Attorney Advertising DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyCalifornia Privacy Policy and Notice of Collection of Personal InformationTransparency in Coverage Rule