man-user-icon Client Login Portal
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    Labaton Sucharow
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Contact Us
    • Knowledge Network
    • Client Login
    • Search
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    Labaton Sucharow
    • News & Events
      • Press Room
      • Published
      • Events
    • Digital Library
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • News & Events
      • Press Room
      • Published
      • Events
      • The Liaison
    • Digital Library
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars

    Barclays and What Happens When You Go After the Whistleblower

    The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, New York Post
    April 13, 2017

    Jordan A. Thomas weighs in on Barclays use of security team to hunt down whistleblower

    The Justice Department is investigating banking giant Barclays and the United States Postal Service (USPS) over an alleged attempt to expose a whistleblower. Barclays Chief Executive Office, Jes Staley, reached out to postal inspectors after its board received two letters from an anonymous employee complaining about the hiring of a mid-level executive. The Justice Department investigators are currently trying to determine whether officials at Barclays or USPS inspectors may have violated civil Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections. While the civil protections of Dodd-Frank are clear, there are questions surrounding the severity of the repercussions.

    Partner and Whistleblower Chair Jordan A. Thomas explained to The Wall Street Journal how attempting to unmask a whistleblower can negatively impact an organization. “It is very seductive for people within organizations to want to find out and hunt down whistleblowers, but inevitably it ends badly for the organization,” Thomas said. “The best practice of responsible companies is not to hunt the whistleblower but to investigate the underlying allegations,” he added. When organizations or top executives hunt down whistleblowers they are undermining the culture of integrity within the organization “because people will question whether in fact the company means it when it says you can report anonymously,” he said.

    Thomas described to the Financial Times why Jes Staley's decision to investigate the anonymous letter sends the wrong message. "Healthy organizations encourage their employees to speak up and they focus on the misconduct report, not the person who reported it," Thomas said. He added, "If your people don't trust you, they won't talk to you."

    Thomas also spoke to the New York Post and shed light on the possibility of government officials facing criminal charges if they are caught assisting the bank in discovering the whistleblower. “Under what circumstances do government agencies work for corporations?” Thomas asked.

    Useful Links

    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Center

    Our Locations

    footer-list-map_icon New York
    140 Broadway
    New York, NY 10005
    212-907-0700

    footer-list-map_icon Delaware
    300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1340
    Wilmington, DE 19801
    302-573-2540

    Useful Links

    footer-list-map_icon Washington, D.C.
    1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    202-772-1880

    Stay Connected

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    Labaton Sucharow
    • Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • labaton.com
    • Labaton Sucharow All Rights Reserved 2019

    Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

    The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon any single source of information, including advertising on this website. You may ask us to send you further information about us, and we urge you to review other sources of information about us.