man-user-icon Client Login Portal
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    Labaton Sucharow
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Contact Us
    • Knowledge Network
    • Client Login
    • Search
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    Labaton Sucharow
    • News & Events
      • Press Room
      • Published
      • Events
    • Digital Library
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • News & Events
      • Press Room
      • Published
      • Events
      • The Liaison
    • Digital Library
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars

    James Staley’s Series of Unfortunate Events

    The New York Times
    August 26, 2017

    Jordan A. Thomas on unmasking whistleblowers

    Chair of the Firm’s Whistleblower Representation Practice Jordan A. Thomas, was recently quoted in an article profiling James E. Staley, Chief Executive of Barclays bank. The article focuses on Staley's investigation by British bank regulators for trying to unmask a whistleblower who criticized the competency of one of his senior hires, Tim Main, formerly of JP Morgan.

    Shortly after Main's hire was announced, a letter was sent to Barclays’ independent directors, according to people briefed on its details, complaining about Main’s behavior during his rough spell at JPMorgan. Troubled by the letter, Staley said he had believed the intent of its writer was to “maliciously smear” their colleague.

    Hoping to defend Main, Staley asked fellow executives whether he could investigate the letter writer’s identity, however since the letter was being treated internally as a “whistleblow,” with protections around anonymity and against retaliation, colleagues told Staley to stand down.

    Weeks later, Staley tried again, this time instructing Barclays’ internal security team to track down the writer, Barclays said. The following January, Barclays said, another whistleblower contacted the board. This time, the complainant found fault with the entire whistleblowing process at Barclays, mentioning Staley’s handling of the Main letters.

    Barclays’ directors hired a London law firm to investigate Staley’s conduct. According to a statement, the firm found that he had “honestly but mistakenly” sought to unmask the writer without realizing the impropriety of his actions; the board accepted the explanation.

    But some lawyers said the entire chapter constitutes a grave breach of protocol, with broad implications for the bank.

    “Seeking to identify the identity of the whistleblower is a violation of the law,” said Jordan A. Thomas, “but it also undermines the culture of integrity within Barclays.”

    If company executives have a reputation for retaliating against whistleblowers, he added, “the leadership of Barclays will be disadvantaged because fewer people are going to be telling them about problems. And they’ll learn about problems when they’re at a more advanced stage.”

    Useful Links

    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Center

    Our Locations

    footer-list-map_icon New York
    140 Broadway
    New York, NY 10005
    212-907-0700

    footer-list-map_icon Delaware
    300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1340
    Wilmington, DE 19801
    302-573-2540

    Useful Links

    footer-list-map_icon Washington, D.C.
    1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    202-772-1880

    Stay Connected

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    Labaton Sucharow
    • Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • labaton.com
    • Labaton Sucharow All Rights Reserved 2019

    Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

    The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon any single source of information, including advertising on this website. You may ask us to send you further information about us, and we urge you to review other sources of information about us.