man-user-icon Client Login Portal
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    Labaton Sucharow
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Network
    • Contact Us
    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Contact Us
    • Knowledge Network
    • Client Login
    • Search
    • addthis
    • link : Client Login
    • knowledge network
    Labaton Sucharow
    • Ongoing Cases
    • Settled | Resolved Cases
    • Featured Cases
      • Securities
      • Derivative
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • REITs and Limited Partnerships
      • Consumer Products & Data Privacy

    In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation

    Settled: June 15, 2007

    Labaton Sucharow served as co-lead counsel in the recently-settled case In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation, which involved manipulation by dozens of large energy companies of the price of natural gas futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX).

    Labaton Sucharow served as co-lead counsel in the In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation, which involved manipulation by dozens of large energy companies of the price of natural gas futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). On June 15, 2007, Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York granted the parties' Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal and approved settlements with the five remaining defendants for over $28 million. This followed his May 24, 2006, Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal approving settlements for more than $72 million against 17 defendants. The total settlement obtained in this complex litigation-almost $101 million-is the second largest class action recovery in the 85-year history of the Commodity Exchange Act.

    Plaintiffs alleged that over twenty defendants, among them the largest energy companies in the United States, including El Paso Merchant Energy L.P., Reliant Energy Services Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc., Aquila Energy Marketing corp., Dynegy Marketing and Trade, CMS, Coral Energy Resources, LP, Williams Companies, Inc., and E-Prime, Inc., manipulated the price of natural gas by engaging in false reports of the price and volume of their trades to sources that publish indices of natural gas information about the market. In addition, plaintiffs alleged that several of these defendants engaged in wash trading, churning, and other market gaming strategies, which created the illusion of false liquidity in the market, and further manipulated the price of natural gas.

    Labaton Sucharow won significant victories throughout litigation including: prevailing on a motion to enforce subpoenas issued by two publishers of natural gas price indices for the production of trade report data, as well as a decision certifying a class of futures traders who were harmed by defendants' manipulation of the price of natural gas futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2002.

    case_study_callout_Naturalgas_2

    Case Materials

    Complaint

    Useful Links

    • Practice Areas
    • Cases
    • About Us
    • News & Events
    • Our People
    • Knowledge Center

    Our Locations

    footer-list-map_icon New York
    140 Broadway
    New York, NY 10005
    212-907-0700

    footer-list-map_icon Delaware
    222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510
    Wilmington, DE 19801
    302-573-2540

    Useful Links

    footer-list-map_icon Washington, D.C.
    1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    212-907-0700

    Stay Connected

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    Labaton Sucharow
    • Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Transparency in Coverage Rule
    • labaton.com
    • Labaton Sucharow All Rights Reserved 2022

    Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

    The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon any single source of information, including advertising on this website. You may ask us to send you further information about us, and we urge you to review other sources of information about us.