Settled: June 04, 2014
On January 10, 2011, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Trust (Massachusetts PRIT) was appointed lead plaintiff in In re Massey Energy Co. Securities Litigation. Judge Irene C. Berger in the Southern District of West Virginia approved Massachusetts PRIT's selection of Labaton Sucharow to serve as co-lead counsel on behalf of purchasers of the publicly traded common stock of Massey Energy Company (Massey) between February 1, 2008 and July 27, 2010 (the class period). On March 11, 2011, Massachusetts PRIT filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
As alleged, during the class period Massey embarked on "safety improvement initiatives" to bolster public perception and present a new corporate image following a deadly fire at one of its coal mines in 2006. Massey revamped a program coined "S-1, P-2, M-3," which meant "safety first, production second, and measurement third." Massey repeatedly reassured investors that the company had put its sordid past behind it and "pull[ed] together to create a culture of safety."
However, Massey had two faces during the class period: a public face, shown by what defendants told investors about Massey's safety practices and improvement initiatives; and a private face, reflected in what they and others at Massey actually did and did not do with regard to safety.
On April 5, 2010, 29 miners died in an explosion at Massey's Upper Big Branch mine at Montcoal in Raleigh County, West Virginia. News of the explosion, subsequent criminal indictments, and Congressional testimony have revealed to the public that Massey had not become an "industry leader in safety" at all.
By July 27, 2010, Massey shares had hit a new low-representing a staggering decline that reduced Massey's market capitalization by more than $3 billion and caused massive losses to the class.
The defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint on April 25, 2011. Briefing on the motions to dismiss and other related motions was completed on July 25, 2011. On September 28, 2011, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion to partially lift the PSLRA discovery stay, allowing partial discovery by plaintiffs during the pendency of the defendants' motions to dismiss-a significant victory for the plaintiffs. On March 28, 2012, the court denied the defendants' motions to dismiss and granted the plaintiffs' related motion to strike certain exhibits submitted by the defendants in support of their motions to dismiss.
On December 9, 2013, lead plaintiff Massachusetts PRIT announced that it had reached a $265 million all-cash settlement with Alpha Natural Resources, Massey's parent company.
A settlement hearing was held on June 4, 2014 at 9:00 am before the Honorable Irene C. Berger on at the Robert C. Byrd U.S. Courthouse, 110 North Heber Street, 3rd Floor Courtroom, Beckley, WV, at which time the court granted final approval to the settlement.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired shares of the common stock of Massey during the period between February 1, 2008 to and July 27, 2010, and were damaged thereby, you may be eligible to recover from the Settlement if you submit a Proof of Claim by July 3, 2014.
Copies of relevant documents can be accessed by clicking on the links to the right.
Order Approving Plan of Allocation
Memo of Law in Support of Motion for Final Approval
Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses
Memo in Support of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses
Joint Declaration for Final Approval and Fee / Exhibits 1-12
Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss
Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
Useful Links
Our Locations
New York
140 Broadway
New York, NY 10005
212-907-0700
Delaware
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1510
Wilmington, DE 19801
302-573-2540
Useful Links
Washington, D.C.
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-772-1880
The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should not take action based upon this information without consulting legal counsel. This site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon any single source of information, including advertising on this website. You may ask us to send you further information about us, and we urge you to review other sources of information about us.